How To Write A Reflection Paper

How To Write A Reflection Paper It's true that the feedback from reviewers is awfully valuable to you and can allow you to enhance the paper. However, you should get feedback from other scientists before submitting for publication. You will waste the time of exhausting-working reviewers, who will give you suggestions that you can have obtained in different ways. A rule of thumb is to submit solely if you're proud for the world to affiliate your name with the work, in its present form. Do not use a single term to check with a number of ideas. If you employ the time period “approach” for every final idea that you just introduce in your paper, then readers will turn into confused. “Half as many” is a significantly better substitute for “2 occasions fewer”. If you do any computations such as ratios, you should internally use the complete precision of your actual measurements, however your paper will report only a limited variety of digits of precision. Choose good names not just for the ideas that you just current in your paper, however for the doc supply file. Don't name the file after the convention to which you're submitting or the 12 months. Even if the paper is accepted, such a name will not inform you what the paper is about when if you look over your files in later years. You could report that your medication's remedy price is .three, the placebo's treatment price is .25, and your drugs's treatment rate is either .05 larger or 20% higher. Just as you need to correctly use “a hundred and twenty% more” versus “a hundred and twenty% as many”, you need to correctly use “3 times faster than” versus “3 instances as quick as”. A associated, additionally widespread, confusion is between “three times quicker than and 3 occasions as quick as”. And, “2 occasions fewer” makes completely no sense. This is a place that use of synonyms to tell apart ideas which might be unrelated is appropriate. For occasion, you might always use “section” when describing an algorithm but “step” when describing how a user uses a device. Give every concept in your paper a descriptive name to make it more memorable to readers. Never use terms like “method 1”, “strategy 2”, or “our strategy”, and avoid acronyms when attainable. If you document and automate these steps, then you'll be able to easily regenerate the paper when wanted. This is beneficial when you re-run experiments or evaluation, or if you need to defend your outcomes towards a criticism by different researchers. If you leave some steps handbook, then you definitely or your colleagues are highly likely to make a mistake or to be unable to reproduce your outcomes later. Your paper probably consists of tables, bibliographies, or different content material that's generated from exterior knowledge. If you know of significant criticisms that reviewers would possibly increase, then don't submit the paper. You mustn't submit your paper too early, when it doesn't reflect well on you and a submission would waste the group's reviewing sources. You shouldn't submit your paper too late, as a result of then the community is deprived of your scientific insights. In general, you should err on the aspect of submitting too late somewhat than too early. It normally greatest not to email the document, however to provide a location from which reviewers can get hold of the most recent version of the paper, corresponding to a model management repository or a URL you will update. That means, you will not clutter inboxes with many revisions, and readers can all the time get the newest copy. Be considerate to your reviewers, who are spending their time that can assist you. Your paper can also be written in a text formatting language corresponding to LaTeX. In every of these instances, it is essential to run some exterior command to create some of the content or to create the ultimate PDF. Do not confuse relative and absolute measurements. For occasion, suppose your medication cures 30% of patients, and the placebo cures 25% of sufferers. When readers misunderstand the paper, that is all the time at least partly the writer's fault! Even if you think the readers have missed the purpose, you will find out how your work may be misinterpreted, and eliminating these ambiguities will improve the paper. Unless your strategy is a small variation on another method, it's usually greatest to defer the related work to the tip of the paper. When it comes first, it offers readers the impression that your work is quite by-product. One good method to automate these duties is by writing a program or making a script for a build system similar to Make or Ant. Instead, give the paper or its folder/directory a reputation that displays its content. Another benefit is that this will also lead you to think about the paper in terms of its content and contributions.